This is supposed to be the "go to" powder-or darn near it- for just about any bottle-necked cartridge 1 could handload. It is the muse for lots of pet loads, still I haven't been content with the final results.

I've employed H4831 (and H4831SC), And that i use it. There aren't many cartridges that I use it for as I feel normally to gravitate to other powders. On the other hand, I can't declare that it isn't going to work. It is just that A few other powders do the job far better for just a provided cartridge. For instance, while in the 280, H4831 gave me superior velocity and really fine groups with Nosler one hundred forty AB. However, RL19 was marginally greater in accuracy, however the velocity was pretty much identical.

The reality that the H4831 is certainly a slower burning powder is specifically why you are observing increased velocities received with that powder, as opposed to That which you've found While using the IMR stuff. Also great powder, but rather better suited to somewhat smaller sized situations using a bit significantly less potential.

Yes you are able to. They're the identical actual powder however the SC powder is just cut shorter so it meters better.

INgunner54 claimed: It has been a bit, but I did get some 4831 SC to test. Uncovered a node and shot some groups.

It can be possible that no further more dialogue is needed, during which circumstance we endorse starting up a whole new thread. If however you are feeling your reaction is needed you are able to even now accomplish that.

i've employed equally and utilized the exact same costs and have not been in a position to inform any noticable distinctions with functionality. the SC Edition meters somewhat smoother is about all. any responses??

and it is advisable to invest in some new load data guides. powder composition and chemistry can does change over time. 4831 powder of a long time back just isn't exact same as what is now available. which is why anyone serious about reloading properly could have probably the most present-day load data publications to check with.

The primary reason I switched from IMR 4831 to H4831 was to make use of the temperature insensitivity of the Hodgdon Intense powder.

You may have to generate some additional posts for getting cleared to carry out PM's. As you reach that standing I would submit inside the categorized reloading segment to determine if anyone is in your area for your trade. Click on to increase...

I h4831 vs h4831sc have experienced very similar expertise with H4350. For me, some ball powders will never shoot nicely with everything apart from Fed215's. Some components just Will not Enjoy well with other. Appears like you have preferred three good powders, I'd assume not less than one of them to shoot.

That is an Intense extruded propellant and features heightened insensitivity to hot and cold temperatures.

Am i able to believe that H4831 could be substituted for H4831sc ? I'm sure the Bodily change but will it impact the burn or velocity? I believe not but I'm not a hundred% positive.

IMR4831 and H4831SC are distinctive. The place you might be h4831sc puzzling it and believing that it's near is H4831 and H4831SC are very equivalent. Those people two are just about the exact same except H4831SC is created to scaled-down grains so h4831sc it meters easier.